This page is one project written up rather than a gallery. It was an office fit-out where the same pantry wall, the same sink run and the same appliance bays were built on three floors from a single set of drawings. The interesting part is not one good unit; it is that the fourteenth unit matched the first. What follows is why that happened, what is behind the wall, and one thing we are not going to do — show you a photograph that pretends to be evidence it is not.
Start with the honest part. The three photographs below are of our own showroom stand, not of the office in the case. We hold installation photographs of that job as well, and we are not publishing them here.
The reason is the camera position. Those frames were taken from three or four metres back, square on to the elevation, because what they were taken to record was a wall of fronts matching across three floors. At that distance the worktop reads as a thin bright line under the appliances — you can tell it is there, you cannot see the surface. On a page about stainless countertops, a photograph where the countertop is a line is worse than no photograph: it invites the reader to assume something the image does not actually show.
So the case is written, the deck photography is ours and labelled, and if you want the installation record for a job like yours, ask for it and we will send the set with the floor count and the date rather than dropping it into a gallery.



What those three frames do show is the part that made the repeat possible: a deck where the sink, the drain channel and the hob were all set out before the sheet was cut, and a folded edge that has to come out the same on every unit.
Building one good pantry is a joinery problem. Building the same pantry fourteen times on three floors is a drawing problem, and these four decisions are what turned one into the other.
| Decision | Prevented |
|---|---|
| One drawing per floor, not per room | Each floor room measured separately — which is how three floors drift |
| Service voids sized on the drawing | The hydrant, the cooler and the filter being discovered on site |
| Panels cut from one nesting per floor | A visible tone step between units on the same wall |
| Every unit numbered on the crate | Three identical-looking crates and one puzzle at the lift |
None of those is exotic. All four are things that get skipped when a job is priced by the unit rather than by the wall.
A pantry looks like a cupboard run. It is actually three services wearing cupboard fronts: water in, water out, and power.
Where a top in a building like this does need plate — a cleaner's sink, a wet tea point, a pass-through — the build we quote is 304 in 6 mm, with the machined edge held to ±0.05 mm, and 316L substituted where cleaning chemicals concentrate. Thickness there is chosen by span rather than by habit, and the tolerance above applies to a machined edge, not to a cut aperture: an aperture is held to ±0.5 mm, and anyone quoting tighter is quoting a number they cannot inspect.
Every one of those is a void that has to be drawn. If the wall is drawn as solid, the void gets cut on site and the panel above it will never fit.
The inside of a unit is where a pantry is judged, and it is exactly the part a photograph of a closed wall cannot show you. Four things are worth pinning down before the wall is drawn, because none of them can be added afterwards without cutting:
All four of those are the same argument as the deck: the thing that goes wrong later is a decision that was left until site. A shelf cut to a microwave is a drawing line; a shelf cut to fit is a Saturday.
Being precise matters more than being impressive here.
What it proves. The job exists, it ran to one drawing across three floors, and the wall was built with a hydrant door, a cooler bay, a fridge bay and a shelf pitch that were all on that drawing. Fourteen units to one specification is a real capability, and it is the one a buyer trying to assess a factory is actually trying to assess.
What it does not prove. It is an office pantry, not a domestic kitchen, and it is a cabinet run with worktops rather than a 6 mm solid plate countertop. If what you need is a countertop cut from plate to ±0.05 mm with a welded bowl, the technical pages describe that and the factory page describes how it is checked — but this page is not the evidence for it.
We would rather say that than let a photograph do work it cannot do. If you want to see a countertop like the one you are ordering, say so and we will photograph the next one off the bench for you specifically.
If the case above is the shape of what you need — a run of units, a sink, services hidden behind fronts — send a plan and a wall elevation. We quote in 24 hours, broken out by plate, cutting, forming, welding, graining and packing, so you can see which line is carrying the cost.
If you need the countertop rather than the cabinets, start with the stainless steel countertops section, and use the technical data pages to fix thickness, grade and edge before anything is drawn. Either way the lead time is 15 working days from a confirmed drawing, and every piece ships with an inspection sheet recording the measurements it was checked against.
Factory and inspection · What this shop can and cannot do · About Bogeqi · Send a drawing for quotation